Meteor Crater Blog

 
  All
  Film and Media
  Fun Stuff
  Group Information
  Meteor Crater General
  Misc
  RV Park
  Science News
  Visitor Posts

By Kathy Candelaria on April 20, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Meteor Crater General

Hello Everyone, Kathy here,  For those of you who have been tuning in to our Barringer Meteorite Crater Story, I apologize for the delay on the conclusion, I am making some updates to the conclusion and will be publishing it as soon as possible.  With our season fast approaching I have not been able to make those updates as fast as I have wanted to.  We are busy here at Meteor Crater and our visitors have been keeping me busy.  I look forward to get the conclusion up by the end of this week if time allows me to. Please keep checking back here with me for the conclusion.   

Continue reading...
Tags: meteor crater

Leave a comment
By Kevin Maloney on April 15, 2014
Visitor from from Pensacola, United States

0 Comments

Category: Visitor Posts

I visited Meteor Crater in June of 2012 and I enjoyed the entire experience. It must be seen to appreciate the scale of the event which occurred here so many eons ago. I will be going back as often as possible and I would gladly drive 1000 miles out of my way to see again and again. Outstanding management and staff. They're passionate about what they share and it is contagious. Thank You, Kevin Maloney

Continue reading...
Tags: visitor comment

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on April 09, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Science News

Hello Everyone, Kathy here with some exciting science news.  Next Tuesday morning, April 14th, the moon will be eclipsed by Earth's shadow.  This total lunar eclipse will be visible across the Western Hemisphere.  The total phase will last 78 minutes, beginning at 3:06 a.m. EDT and ending at 4:24 a.m. EDT.  The moon will just be rising in the western Pacific, so only the last half of the eclipse will be visible there.  In much of Europe and Africa, the moon will be setting, so there won't be much, if anything, to see.  On April 29th, the Southern Hemisphere will be treated to a rare type of solar eclipse.  In all, four exlipses will occur this year, two lunar and two solar.  Tuesday's lunar eclipse may damage a NASA spacecraft that's been circling the moon since fall.  But no worries:  it's near the end of its mission.  Thanks  for joining me today, and any of you are able to catch this event please leave me a comment.  Until next time, Kathy signing out. source:  MSN science news

Continue reading...
Tags: lunar eclipse,NASA,solar eclipse

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on March 30, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Fun Stuff

Hello Everyone, Kathy here with our conclusion of Barringer Meteorite Crater, The Crater Company.  The Barringer Crater Company is a family-owned enterprise dedicated to the preservation and promotion of the Barringer Meteorite Crater, located near Flagstaff, Arizona.  Founded by D. Moreau Barringer in 1903, the Barringer Crater Company continues to promote its founder's abiding interest in the events surrounding the creation of the Crater.  Barringer's descendants, now in their fourth generation, own and operate the company under the same guiding principles which he so strongly advocated.  In keeping with his wishes, the company operates as a privately held business, with each of eight branches of his family represented on the Board of Directors.  The fundamental purpose of the company is the preservatioin of the Crater as a memorial to the pioneering scientific work of its founder. Today, the visitor's center at Meteor Crater is operated by another family owned company, Meteor Crater Enterprises.  The two companies share the same philosophy regarding preservation of the crater.  Recognizing that the Crater is a unique natural landmark of great scientific importance, strong public interest, and significant educational value, it is the long-held policy of both companies to maintain the property in as nearly a natural state as possible and to ensure appropriate and controlled access to it by the general public.  They are also committed to making the Crater available to the scientific community for ongoing research and field study.  In addition to maintaining the Crater itself, the companies has a strong interest in encouraging and supporting scientific exploration and research within the field of meteoritics, particularly in the area of impact phenomena.  Each year they provide modest research grants to scientists around the world to assist them in conducting essential field work and sponsors a limited number of doctoral students in attending international scientific meetings and seminars.  In 1982, the company established an endowed award program known as the Barringer Medal to recognize outstanding scientific achievement in the field of impact cratering.  The Barringer Crater Company  and Meteor Crater Enterprises have an ongoing interest in promoting scientific education about the Crater and its story.  The companies believes that through their stewardship of the Crater, both the general public and the scientific community will benefit from the educational and scientific value of this unique and fascinating natural phenomenon.  Source: www.barringercrater.com  Thank you everyone for tuning in each week to learn more about the Barringer Meteorite Crater (Meteor Crater),  I hope it has inspired you to come to Arizona and see this amazing hole in the ground.

Continue reading...
Tags: The Crater Company

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on March 30, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Fun Stuff

Hello Everyone, Kathy Here with Part 6 of the Barringer Meteorite Crater.  Before a hypothesis is accepted as a scientific theory, it must be challenged, tested and re-tested many times.  It was not until 57 years after Barringer and Tilghman presented their first papers that the impact theory was fully accepted by the scientific community.  During the 40's and 50's, investigations by Robert S. Dietz and others revealed the existence of structures called "shattercones" at many suspected impact sites, although not at the Barringer Crater.  These structures, which can be anywhere from less than an inch to more than six feet tall, can only be created by a sudden intense pressure on existing rock.  Dietz was able to demonstrate that the apexes of the cones at most of these sites pointed upwards, indicating that the force which created them had come from above.  This evidence provided strong support for the idea that the sites were created by meteorite impacts.  The presence of shattercones is now considered as one of the criteria for identifying an impact structure.  Another feature found only at impact sites is the presence of tiny parallel lines called "planar deformation feature" in quartz grains affected by the impact.  The intense heat and pressure of the impact causes the crystals to melt along submicroscopic planes, leaving parallel bands of melted and unmelted quartz.  No purely terrestrial process can produce enough pressure to create these deformations.  SHOEMAKER'S PROOF:  In 1960, Eugene Shoemaker, Edward Chao and David Milton were responsible for the discovery of a new mineral at the Barringer crater.  This mineral, a form of silica called "coesite", had first been created in a laboratory in 1953 by chemist Loring Coes.  Its formation requires extremely high pressures and temperatures, greater than any occuring naturally on earth.  Coesite and a similar material called "stishovite" have since been identified at numerous other suspected impact sites, and are now accepted as indicators of impact origin.  Finally, in 1963, Eugene Shoemaker published his landmark paper analyzing the similarities between the Barringer crater and craters created by nuclear test explosions in Nevada.  Carefully mapping the sequence of layers of the underlying rock, and the layers of the ejecta blanket, where those rocks were deposited in reverse order, he demonstrated that the nuclear craters and the Barringer crater were structurally similar in nearly all respects.  His paper provided the clinching arguments in favor of an impact, finally convincing the last doubters.  WHY SHOULD WE CARE:  Daniel Moreau Barringer's struggle to prove the impact origin of his crater is an example of the enormous difference that one determined individual can make - even if that individual is a non-scientist working to change the prevailing scientific view.  His story tells us about the importance of intuitive leaps, careful data-gathering, stubbornness, and even self-interest in the progress of science.  But it also demonstrates the rigorous testing that a scientific hypothesis must endure before it is finally accepted by the scientific community.  The progress of science is seldom a simple matter.  Gilbert saw the correct answer to the riddle of the crater, but lacked the passion to pursue it further when his first tests failed.  Barringer was right when his intuition coincided with his self-interest, but wrong when the truth diverged from it.  Both of them ultimately failed to understand the crater because they did not take into account the enormous speed of a meteorite impact, and the enormous release of energy resulting from that speed.  A variety of discoveries by different scientist over a period of sixty years would be necessary before the impact theory emerged as the unchallenged winner.  Continuing research at the Barringer Meteorite Crater and other impact sites has taught us not only about our own world, but about the history of the solar system out of which it was born.  In the words of Eugene Shoemaker, "the impact of solid bodies is the most fundamental of all processes that have taken place on the terrestrial planets....Collision of smaller objects is the process by which the terrestrial planets were born."  Thank you everyone for tuning in to part 6 of our wonderful story, please tune in on Tuesday for our conclusion (The Crater Company) to the Barringer Meteorite Crater.  Source:  www.barringercrater.com Photo: Geologist Eugene Shoemaker published in the landmark paper conclusively demonstrating an impact origin for the Barringer Meteorite Crater. Photo USGS

Continue reading...
Tags: Shoemaker,coesite,stishovite,impact crater

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on March 25, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Fun Stuff

Hello Everyone, Kathy here with Part 5 of Barringer Meteorite Crater.  While the scientific debate continued, the mining venture at the crater was not going well.  Early attempts at drilling for the meteorite had failed when the drill encountered quicksand beneath the crater floor.  Renewed drilling attempts under the south rim, conducted at enormous expense, also proved fruitless.  A discouraged Tilghman had back out of the venture in 1910.  AN OUTSIDE CONSULTANT:  In 1928, $200,000 was raised for a finalassault on the meteorite.  By this time Barringer's estimate of its size had risen to ten million tons, and he was envisioning a profit of $250,000,000 on a $500,000 investment. But the directors of the Standard Iron Company were growing nervous.  When the new mine shaft hit water in such great quantities that it could not be pumped out, they consulted the astronomer F. R. Moulton for his opinion on the size of the meteorite.  Moulton's answer was devastating.  Based on the amount of energy produced by an impact at the enormous speed of a meteorite arriving from space, he concluded that an object big enough to create the crater would probably weigh only 300,000 tons.  That was only 3% of the amount claimed by Barringer, and too small to justify any further drilling.  In addition, Moulton argued that the energy of the impact would have resulted in the total vaporization of the meteorite itself.  THE END OF THE OPERATION:  Work was halted at the crater.  In a flurry of correspondence over the next three months, Moulton's conclusions were debated by Barringer, his directors, and a number of prominent scientists.  Gradually it became clear that Moulton's arguments were persuasive.  On November 23, 1929, Moulton's second and more thorough analysis arrived; it buttressed the author's original conclusions with 127 pages of reasoning and mathematical anaylsis.  By November 30, Barringer was dead of a massive heart attack.  He had lost nearly all of his own fortune, along with hundreds of thousands entrusted to him by his investors.  But his children saw his ideas vindicated.  The general public knows his discovery as "Meteor Crater"; its proper scientific name, as determined by the Meteoritical Society, is the Barringer Meteorite Crater.  Source:  www.barringercrater.com  Please tune in on Tuesday for Part 5, Scientific Vindication.  See you back her on Tuesday. 

Continue reading...
Tags: Barringer,Moulton

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on March 18, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Fun Stuff

Hello Everyone, Kathy here with the conclusion to Part 4 - The Battle for Impact Theory.  It was probably significant for the future of the controversy that Barringer's first paper began with a tactless reference to G. K. Gilbert.  as he later recalled, "I gave expression to my surprise that any experienced geologist could have failed to recognize from the evidence, so plainly to be seen, the fact that this crater could not be the result of volcanic forces."  Geologists at the USGS were offended.  Some of Gilbert's colleagues argued vigorously against the impact hypothesis, and even ridiculed Barringer's conclusions.  And Gilbert's great prestige kept others silent, even though they privately admitted that Barringer was right.  Barringer stubbornly persisted, inviting scientists to visit the crater and eventually winning more and more converts.  But Gilbert and the U.S.G.S. refused to comment publicly.  Barringer's outsider status, his forceful and opinionated personality, and his scornful dismissal of contrary opinions, could not have endeared him to the scientific establishment of his time.  As he wrote in 1912 to the inventor Elihu Thomson, "They know in their heart of hearts that I have got them beaten and yet they are not men enough to admit it."  NEW DISCOVERIES:  In 1908 Barringer's conclusions were championed by the eminent geologist George P. Merrill.  Merrill analyzed two new varieties of sandstone discovered by Barringer at the crater, and concluded that both must have been produced by a brief but enormous pressure, greater than any known to occur through terrestrial processes.  Merrill also pointed to the undisturbed rock beds below the crater, which proved that the force that created the crater could not have come from below.  At around the same time Barringer made another discovery.  All previous exploratioins of the crater had been based on the assumption that the meteorite struck from directly above.  Barringer, however, began to test that assumption by firing rifles into the mud at various angles, and discovered that a projectile traveling at an oblique angle at high velocity would nevertheless create a round hole.  Because of the upward bulge of the south rim, and the symmetrical distribution of meteorite fragments around a north-south axis, he concluded that the meteorite was actually located under that rim, and all further drilling was carried out there.  By this time, Barringer was estimating the size of the meteorite at above a million tons.  Thanks for tuning in and I look forward to meeting with you again on Tuesday for Part 5 Disaster for Barringer.  Source:  www.barringercrater.com  Photo:  Barringer's core samples from the crater, including meteoritic material.

Continue reading...
Tags: barringer crater,Meteoritic Material,George P. Merrill

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on March 18, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Fun Stuff

Hello Everyone, Kathy here with Part 4 of our story.  Thank you for tuning in today.  Barringer's conclusion about the impact origin of the crater was still only a hypothesis.  In order to raise money for his planned mining venture, he had to convince the scientific community that he was correct.  Barringer and Tilghman set about gathering evidence in support of their claim.  Before long, the search for a nickel-iron fortune had become deeply entangled with Barringer's quest for the prestige of being the first person to prove the impact origin of the crater.  BARRINGER'S EVIDENCE:  In 1906, and again in 1909, Barringer and Tilghman presented their arguments for the impact origin of the crater to the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia.  They included:  The presence of millions of tons of finely pulverized silica, which could only have been created by enormous pressure;  the large quantities of meteoritic iron, in the form of globular "shale balls", scattered around the rim and surrounding plain;  the random mixture of meteoritic material and ejected rocks;  the fact that the rock strata (a horizontal layer of material, especially one of several parallel layers arranged one on top of another) on the rim and on the surrounding plain appeared to have been deposited in the opposite order from their order in the underlying rock beds, indicating that the topmost material had been thrown out of the crater first, followed by the rocks from the lower strata;  the absence of any naturally occurring volcanic rock in the vicinity of the crater.  Not all of their audience were convinced.  One writer said of Barringer's 1909 address to the National Academy of Sciences at Princeton: "Some persons could scarcely conceal their derisive thoughts.  Nevertheless...Barringer ploughed through his paper, painful though it must have been for him, until he completed it."  Thank you for tuning in today for our story due to the length of this section I will be finishing Part 4 section 2 on Friday.  Please join me for the conclusion to The Battle of Impact Theory.  Source:  www.barringercrater.com  Photo: Shale balls found at the crater, from Barringer's 1909 paper.

Continue reading...
Tags: Impact Theory

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on March 18, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Fun Stuff

Hello Everyone, Kathy here with Part 3 - Barringer Arrives from our story Barringer Meteorite Crater.  Daniel Moreau Barringer, a Philadelphia mining engineer, was a man of immense vigor and intelligence, a charismatic, impatient and hot-tempered individual who did not suffer fools gladly, and who enjoyed quoting his wife's description of him as "half gentlemen and half savage."  After graduating from Princeton University in 1879 at the age of 19, he went on to become president of his class at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, from which he graduated in 1882, receiving his A. M. from Princeton in the same year.  But the practice of law bored him.  His real interests were in the outdoor life and in big-game hunting in the West, where Theodore Roosevelt and the author Owen Wister were his hunting companions.  In search of an occupation that would allow him to pursue these interests, he turned to mining, and by 1902 had made himself a considerable fortune.  BARRINGER'S LEAP: In a casual conversation with his friend Samuel J. Holsinger in 1902, Barringer became aware of the existence of the crater and meteoritic iron around it.  They were sitting on the porch of a Tucson hotel, getting bored with the musical performance inside.  As Holsinger later recalled the incident, Barringer "dropped his cigar", and exclaimed, "That must be impossible! If true why have I not heard of this remarkable phenomenon before?"  Like Gilbert, Barringer reasoned that if the crater had been formed by such an impact, an enormous mass of meteoritic iron would still lie buried within it.  A few months later, Holsinger confirmed by letter that small balls of meteoritic iron were randomly a mixture of rock and iron, convincing Barringer that the crater had been created simultaneously with the arrival of a meteorite.  If they had been deposited at different times, he reasoned, the rock and the iron would be found in separate layers.  He "no longer doubted, but...knew as well as i know today tht the crater...must be due to the impact of a body colliding with our earth."  Without ever having seen the crater, he enlisted his friend Philadelphia mathematician and physicist Benjamin Chew Tilghman, in the formation of the Standard Iron Company, and began securing mining patents for the crater and the land around it.   Thanks for tuning in today for part 3, you can catch part 4 - The Battle for Impact Theory on Friday.  I look forward to continuing this story with all of you.  Source:  www.barringercrater.com

Continue reading...
Tags: meteor crater,Daniel Moreau Barringer,1902

Leave a comment
By Kathy Candelaria on March 17, 2014
-

0 Comments

Category: Fun Stuff

Hello Everyone, Kathy here with Part 2 of the Barringer Meteor Crater, Investigating a Mystery.  Although meteorite falls had been observed for hundreds of years, until the twentieth century no one had ever identified a crater created by a meteorite.  Most scientists rejected the possibility of such a crater, believing that all natural landforms had been created slowly, over thousands or even millions of years, rather than in a single catastrophic moment.  ENTER GROVE KARL GILBERT: In 1891, however, one scientist became interested in the giant crater in the Arizona desert.  Grove Karl Gilbert, the chief geologist for the U.S. Geological Survey, was the most renowned geologist of his generation.  He was tolerant, generous, and fair-minded, with an intense dislike of controversy of any kind; he has been described as "perhaps the closest equivalent to a saint that American science has yet produced."  Gilbert's prestige was so great that none of his colleagues or successors were willing to publicly question his conclusions, even when it became apparent that some of those conclusions had been wrong.  TESTING TWO HYPOTHESIS:  In keeping with his careful, methodical approach to science, Gilbert visited the crater to test two hypothesis about its formation.  The first was that it had been formed by the impact of a giant meteorite.  The second was that it was the result of an explosion of superheated steam, caused by volcanic activity far below the surface.  Gilbert assumed that if the crater had been formed by a meteorite, that meteorite must have been nearly as big as the crater itself.  He also assumed that it was still there, taking up space underneath the crater floor.  He therefore decided to test the impact hypothesis in two ways:  * By comparing the volume of the hollow of the crater to the volume of the ejected material.  * By experimenting with magnets to test for a large mass of buried iron.  If the meteorite were still under the crater floor, he reasoned, the space inside the crater would be smaller than the volume of material thrown out by the impact.  And a large mass of iron would attract a magnet, altering the direction of a compass needle.  The results of both tests were negative.  Gilbert concluded that the crater was created by a steam explosion, and that the thousands of meteorite fragments lying around it were simply coincidence.  He later used his investigation of the crater, and his own abandonment of the impact hypothesis, in a series of lectures illustrating the application of the dispassionate (not influenced) scientific approach.  Thank you for tuning in for Part 2 of Barringer Meteor Crater.  Please come back on Friday for Part 3, Barringer Arrives.  Source: www.barringercrater.com  Photo  Geologist Grove Karl Gilbert, Image: USGS

Continue reading...
Tags: barringer crater,Grove Karl Gilbert,Hypothesis,Mystery

Leave a comment